As I prepare my surprise bid for the Republican Party candidate for president, I’ve burned my platform down to just one plank: absolute support for gay marriage in all 50 states and Alaska.
That’s right. In order to jump start the economy, it’s time to nationalize GM.
Anyone who follows American election politics knows that certain unions are a hotter topic than climate change. Some will say I’m taking this position out of opportunism. Others may think me altruistic, but since when has altruism helped anyone?
I believe that if two people are in love and determined to screw things up, they should be allowed to form a union. It’s only fair. Everyone should be free to wed, start a family, and mess up the next generation the same way our parents did with us.
Like us, the kids will be all right. There’s no evidence that children of GMs will turn out any worse than the others. Thanks to Nintendo, most kids barely interact with their parents anyway.
But love and fairness are not the reasons I’ll legalize GM as president. Sure, I’m for all that squishy stuff, but my GM position is based on cold-hearted economics.
If traditional marriage is good for the economy, GM will be even better.
Just imagine how much those wedding parties will cost and how much champagne the guests will drink.
Modernizing the definition of marriage is our fastest ticket out of the Great Recession. This can't be a state by state affair. Nationalizing GM will provide an instant boon to businesses. The sudden cash infusion to wedding planners and florists, hotels and caterers will be so lucrative the Democrats might propose a GM windfall tax.
GM ceremonies, bridal registries and honeymoons will create a multi-billion dollar industry overnight. The miracle of P-town will be duplicated so quickly that I’m shocked that Mitt Romney, the business-minded former Governor of the P-town State, hasn’t scooped me on this issue.
GM is a gift that keeps on giving. Assuming these new unions will be no more successful than their traditional brethren, the economy will benefit twofold: once from the celebrations, and later from the orgy of spending on divorce lawyers.
Since most divorced people eventually remarry, GM will be one of the most virtuous cycles in economics.
This is a great issue for business minded Republican Party leadership. Embracing GM is both fiscally responsible and consistent with the Republican principle of getting big government out of people’s lives.
GM is so logical, that I anticipate the other candidates will quickly adopt my wide stance on the topic and that’s fine with me. A good idea has many fathers and what’s good for GM is good for America.
Some funny stuff here. Nationalizing marriage under one law would take it from the province of the states where it currently resides. But something will have to be done because right now the states have an agreement to recognize the marriages performed in each other's states. If State #1 decides to recognize plural marriage (for example) and State #2 doesn't, State #1 can refuse to recognize any marriages from State #2. I think it's only a matter of time before that happens.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete